First-class passengers on the Titanic were more than twice as likely to survive the disaster than those in third class
A JSTOR Daily article by Nashwa Khan published in 2016 titled "What the Titanic Reveals About Class and Life Expectancy" discusses the link between socioeconomic status and the lower survival rate for third-class passengers aboard the Titanic. The article highlights how as a passenger's socioeconomic status declined so did their likelihood of survival. The article suggests using the event of the Titanic sinking as a lens to help analyze the relationship between socioeconomic status and life expectancy.
An article written by Mark Carrigan published 2012 titled "Social Class and Life Chances as seen through Survivor Rates on the Titanic" also talks about the role of class for the passengers. Carrigan emphasized how the class system in 1912 was extremely rigid and shaped the outcome of passenger survival. Carrigan also criticizes the poor design of the ship for contributing to poor survival rates due to the lack of lifeboats on board the ship.
Hall revealed that women had a higher survival rate because of policy. According to Hall, overall the policy was adhered to however, some crew members who were in charge of filling the lifeboats were more lenient than others and let several men into the lifeboats. Therefore, due to this policy women (and children) were given priority seating in the lifeboats. However, not all women were equally prioritized which resulted in 51% of third class women dying.
Passengers embarked from Southampton, England; Cherbourg, France; and Queenstown, Ireland (now Cobh). Since Cherbourg embarked with the most first-class passengers, Cherbourg had a higher survival rate of 56%. Moreover, since Queenstown embarked with the most third-class passengers, Queenstown passengers had a lower survival rate of 36%.
Does all this mean that a first-class woman who embarked from Cherbourg was guaranteed to survive the fatal incident? No, however, she would have had a much more significant survival probability than a third-class male from Cherbourg.
A 2012 article by Bridget Diamond-Welch titled "A Nightmare of Titanic Proportions: Social Class & A Ticket to Ride" contends that during the events of the Titanic, social class and gender played a role in one's survival. However, Diamond-Welch argues that social class still significantly influences the quality of life and life expectancy for many around the world. For example, wealthier people have better access to health care and resources such as clean air and water. She also discusses how infant mortality rate is significantly higher in lower-income and middle-income countries compared to higher-income countries.
Although the events of the Titanic happened over 100 years ago, the determinants of survival are similar today. People are still limited and restricted based on the social class they are born into which greatly impacts their quality of life and may even contribute towards their death.
Although the events of the Titanic happened over 100 years ago, the determinants of survival are similar today. People are still limited and restricted based on the social class they are born into which greatly impacts their quality of life and may even contribute towards their death.